Misconceptions In Passive Investment
There is a big amount of false info that’s been circulating about the subject of active and passive investment. That is to be expected for a debate that has been raging for a long time now. Aside from that, there is also much on the line from salaries of fund managers to retiree’s savings. What’s unfortunate for investors is that, it is not possible to try out other investment opportunities. Instead, it is requiring a great deal of great deal of analysis and research to choose a strategy. Regardless if you are rooting for active or passive, it is extremely important that you make yourself aware of the facts from fiction in order to come up with a well informed decision to how you can invest your hard earned money in the best way possible.
Here are the facts that need to be cleared up when it comes to passive investment to help refine the debate between the two subjects.
Number 1. There is no action – if only passive investing was so basic like placing money in index fund and wait for all money to roll in. The truth is, passive investors can work as performers of portfolio observation, discipline and construction.
The action starts by allocating money strategically among the varieties of asset classes that help in attaining long term financial goal when developing a portfolio together with passive investments such as index funds. If ever these allocations change, then more action is to be found with passive investors who rebalance their portfolio diligently by making trades return to assets back into their original level.
Number 2. Passive investing attains returns that are below market averages – yes this is true mainly because of the cost but, average returns are in eye of investors. Index funds are seeking to replicate market index so even if they do accurately, it will still be below average for the net of fees. Index funds on the other hand typically have lower costs than active funds meaning, they have better probabilities to get near market averages for a longer period of time.
Active funds are also charging higher fees for personnel to perform research and trades which eats away at returns as well as contribute to abysmal historical record of matching or even beating market averages.
Number 3. Passive investing is deemed as cookie-cutter strategy – the detractors of passive investment believe that it can’t beat its counterpart, the active investments because they’re not managed tactfully to change with market swings or to take advantage of future events. But, there’s actually a benefit from the uniformity of passive investing since same strategy can be applied from one investor to the other.
Cited reference: see this page